Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader. others think that people can learns leadership skills. Discuss both views.
It is accepted by few masses that leadership is an inherit skills; however some says that this skill can be developed by doing work on it. This is not wrong people born with these skills leads the field wherever there are involved but at some places with stringent work culture people may seek these skills. This essay pertain both views with suitable examples.
Individuals with leadership skills get an advantage on various steps of their life and it is hard to earn these skills in short pace and sometimes impossible. After tertiary education, when a student lands on job then it is necessary for them to understand the working hands of the company and then lead them. For instance, a people with lack of leadership skills will try to do most of the work by their own rather distributing to the employees. This tends to make people to be free handed and ruins the work culture.
Moreover, at some places trainings are given to the people to work on their primary skills like leadership. At some extent these trainings helps a lot people to add on these skills and to implement it in day to day lives. For example, companies like TATA, Adani, Jindal organises various events related to leaderships skills intend to implement on field to augment the productivity. But at certain designation like IS, IPS and other senior holding people must have all these skills.
To conclude, it is an evitable truth that people inherited with leadership skills are proven more successful. In contrast, people with lack of leadership skills may attend various seminars in order to add on these skills. But these people may not be as much successful as inherit one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-17 | Piyush Somani | 67 | view |
- Below is the map of Brandfield city planner have decided to build a two new shopping mall for the city and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader others think that people can learns leadership skills Discuss both views 67
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh disadvantageous 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh disadvantageous 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cepted by few masses that leadership is an inherit skills; however some says that this ski...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'pertains'.
Suggestion: pertains
...eople may seek these skills. This essay pertain both views with suitable examples. Ind...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82105263158 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51866287252 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6554515396 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248412963807 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101389271866 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415825788825 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166274930232 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216758330312 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.