Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households. What problems are caused by household waste?
What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term?
The sizeable amount of waste produced by domestic activities is the root cause for numerous problems. These, along with plausible solutions, will be elucidated in this essay.
Issues stemming from large volumes of waste are wide-ranging. The most immediate is its impediment on efforts to classify trash and promote material reuse. Sorting household waste is a complex task as it comes from a diversity of materials, encompassing but not limited to paper, metal and plastic. As the effectiveness of waste classification and treatment is reduced, environmental pollution may be further exacerbated. For instance, landfills that are increasingly occupied by plastic material may be a source of greenhouse gas emission upon waste incineration or microplastic pollution, seeping through soil into water streams and enter food webs. Also, animals that happen to feed on these landfills can also ingest indigestible objects as food and possibly lose their lives for not being to take in nutritious food.
Having examined these issues, it is possible to resolve them using both short-term and long-term solutions. Temporary remedies call for the operation of more waste-treating facilities, equipped with better sorting schemes and equipment, such as more powerful magnetic conveyor belts. This should help to cope with the recent increasing quantity of trash. However, a long-lasting solution requires a more fundamental change in people’s lifestyles and practice. This revolves around raising public awareness in a multitude of ways, including promoting the usage of reusable objects in place of one-time-use items.
In conclusion, the alarming quantity of waste from households is hampering conservation efforts and worsening environmental contamination. To deal with this, a range of solutions could be implemented, involving the use of effective waste-treating plants and encouragement towards a change in lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-19 | Quân Lê 2020 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-24 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
- In many countries truancy skipping classes is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy What may be the effects on the child and the wider community 89
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 56
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ragement towards a change in lifestyle.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7649122807 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21835685839 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670175438596 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7329855923 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.533333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259810274242 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784908750295 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509408308724 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144136366292 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234596513931 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.