Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student. In this regard, peers have more of an impact than teachers do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Opinions diverge on whether students can be positively influenced by friends more than teachers. Although some formidably censure this sentiment, I am on the opposite side owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, the study progress can be achieved more easily if students work together instead of receiving formal instruction from their professors. First, friends’ explanations are much clearer to understand in comparison to the teacher’s lectures. Now that the way those who are in the same age demonstrate the questions is simpler in light of not containing numerous specialized terms and abstract knowledge like teachers do. Moreover, some students have poor psychology so they are not able to talk with their educators about their misunderstanding about the lectures. Therefore, resolving wonders with their friends seems to be less scary since they are not under severe diatribe if giving out pointless questions.
When it comes to emotional development, friends are of paramount importance. Perceptibly, people who are at the same age can comprehend others so that students can avoid the sense of loneliness or isolation and their emotions can be improved in optimistic ways. Meanwhile, with the huge age and perception disproportion, the way students communicate with teachers can be fairly hard and formal. This suggests that they are on no account to freely express their true self as well as solidify their emotion if there are no friends around. To be more specific, ones with friends are more approachable and confident in communication than others who do not have any friends.
By way of conclusion, peers are key to developing the students’ academic achievement and emotional growth.
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 78
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41198501873 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03998979689 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2175543636 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263578556252 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926970519547 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060365848471 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173296339666 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383420043711 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.