Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
A lot of chores which were done physically have been replaced by the use of machines. This essay describes the possible pros and cons of using various mechanical components in daily life. I think utilizing a tool can make our life a little bit easier than doing all the things manually.
There are a lot of advantages of integrating a machine in everyday activities. Firstly, it can complete a task in a shorter time than humans. For instance, a dishwasher can wash a large number of plates within a very short period compared to us. A money counting device can count money a lot faster than any human being. It not only does the work quickly, but also with great precision. Moreover, applying different devices has also helped to reduce the workload of people greatly. They also play a vital role in providing security and comfort in regular life.
On the other hand, there are certainly some significant disadvantages of being too much dependent on such components. Firstly, they can be very costly. For example, a good dishwasher can cost almost 30000 BDT which is a lot for a simple family. Secondly, relying too much on them may easily make people lazy. Humans will not want to do physical work or exercises anymore and as a result, may be vulnerable to diseases. Last but not the least, replacing people with robots can also reduce job opportunities and thus making a person jobless.
In conclusion, I want to say that we cannot stop the rise of machines, nor that we want to. If there is a certain balance and supervision in using machines for our regular works, this can certainly be a blessing for our future generation.
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007 78
- The charts below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...nk utilizing a tool can make our life a little bit easier than doing all the things manual...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ns. For instance, a dishwasher can wash a large number of plates within a very short period compa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75174825175 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65979138188 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629370629371 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2215491834 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149664900882 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422797582834 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492479180621 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881459742721 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405216023726 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.