Many young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning. Why? What can be done to encourage a positive attitude to learning in young people?
More and more students develop poor attitudes towards schooling because of the out-of-date teaching methods and heavy burden. To stimulate children's study enthusiasm, educational experts should organize more practical activities and reduce marking stress.
For the theory-heavy basic lessons, young generations find it hard to be interested in schools. In simple words, teaching without visual elements and practical experiences fails at incentivizing juniors, leading to excessive boredom towards learning. The educational program in VietNam is a prime example that young people have to absorb abundant theories every day. Coupled with that, traditional opinions about marks impose pressure on scholars, resulting in negative feelings and a tendency to leave schools. As learning for the young becomes a burden and a critical task that remains no pleasure, dropping out of school is their only choice.
Some viable measures, including increased practical lessons, may be taken to tackle such problems. By allowing children to be involved in activities to discover and practice new knowledge, it is easier to motivate them and aid their memories of information. Major universities like Oxford or Columbia, for instance, run laboratory courses for learners to incentivize their learning interests. It implies that this innovative method could contribute to the enjoyment and optimism of students. Moreover, parents and teachers should support their children instead of imposters, meaning that the marking pressure could be minimized and schoolers can enjoy their studies.
In conclusion, once studying in traditional ways and overwhelmingly being forced to achieve high marks, young people are inclined to cease their academic path. However, changes in lessons' activities and adults' judgments could address it. In the future, family-school cooperation would remain essential to the enhancement of childrens' study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 67 | view |
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small commun 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance or is it better to 84
- The graph below show relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86428571429 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91368166009 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678571428571 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4145135933 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20706298345 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556867292587 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457462938728 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10969274778 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574868115728 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.