Many young people now know more about international movie and pop stars than famous people in the history of their own country.
What are the reasons? What can be done to make young people interested famous people in the history of their own country.
There has been a growing concern about the fact that global stars from the entertainment industry are ubiquitous among young generation nowadays while it is not the case for historical figures in their country. This is due to the way the education system and the media work nowadays, but right efforts are needed to make positive changes in this situation.
There are two main reasons for the phenomenon of the youth's biased awareness, coming from how young people are exposed to famous people nowadays. About the successful individuals from the past, young people mostly know about them via traditional lessons in school. These learners often have to memorize historical knowledge under the pressure of passing certain examinations; therefore, they often forget everything about history once achieving their desirable scores. Celebrities, however, are often much more exciting with beautiful appearance and attractive performing skills, so they could get absolute attention easily from young audience by satisfying their entertaining demands. As a result, famous movie and pop stars are undeniably popular among this specific group of the population.
To make young people more interested in historical individuals, several strategies could be applied. From educational perspective, teachers should motivate their students to learn history better by making them understand the importance of knowing this subject as well as the excitement people often have when talking about famous people from the past. From the entertaining point of view, the government should prioritize producing songs and movies about historical figures over what the entertainment industry has done for years, to ensure that more young people would be aware of those who made significant contribution to the country in the past. For example, in Vietnam, the government often supports many directors, both spiritually and financially, in making movies about famous kings throughout the country's history.
In conclusion, because the two key players in directing young people attention toward pop and movie stars are education and the media, we need feasible solutions to make these citizens more knowledgeable about famous historical individuals accordingly.
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Many people think that countries should import less food and produce more for their population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people could be naturally good leaders. Others believe that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Many young people now know more about international movie and pop stars than famous people in the history of their own country.What are the reasons? What can be done to make young people interested famous people in the history of their own country. 84
- Many people argue that living in horizontal city is the best, while others believe that living in vertical buildings is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69345238095 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83275804484 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.765030148 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.416666667 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402860509061 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147448595477 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074313943914 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235330444537 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893845306146 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.