Some people could be naturally good leaders. Others believe that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Ideologies on leadership potentials have recently been polarized. While some people still hold the traditional belief that being a leader is decided by nature, I would argue that these abilities are the outcome of suitable training and education.
It is understandable why the stereotype of inborn leading skills is still popular in our modern society. The reasoning of those in favour of this misbelief is often about the inherence of human-managing ability as a simple fact, combining with pointing out that some individuals would never be able to be the head of an organization with innate disabilities. However, there has never been a single person recorded becoming a charismatic leader without any previous related studying or working experience. Also, the case of disable people could easily be refuted since many of those, such as numerous individuals who have been recorded by Vietnamese government, have got rival for establishing and running successful business.
On the other side of the spectrum, arguments for the learnable leadership skills are unambiguously highly convincing. Firstly, throughout human history, nearly all talented leaders had received contemporarily conventional education at some point, normally thanks to being born in an upper-class family or guided by other successful individuals. They often first needed to master linguistics subjects to ensure certain levels of literacy, then formally participated in real working environment to be trained by and learn from experienced senior members of their organizations before being the chief themselves and eventually gaining mile-stone achievement. Secondly, in any organizations nowadays, most of their presidents or chairmen have had received tertiary education in related fields. For example, nearly all Prime Ministers in the UK have studied politics as the major at a privilege university like Oxford or Cambridge.
In conclusion, despite the traditional opinion of unlearnable leadership, I am convinced that the skill of leading an organization can only be gained through suitable education as well as related exposure to the real environment.
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Many young people now know more about international movie and pop stars than famous people in the history of their own country.What are the reasons? What can be done to make young people interested famous people in the history of their own country. 84
- Many people think that countries should import less food and produce more for their population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people argue that living in horizontal city is the best, while others believe that living in vertical buildings is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Some people could be naturally good leaders. Others believe that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70093457944 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16835754505 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641744548287 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6409741578 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.5 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15255457698 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489419308913 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387345878126 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951567709457 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154459258412 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.