Material success and fame are often attributed to some talent Do you
think it is possible to get name, fame and money even if there is no
talent?
We come across both types of people, those who have either been rich and
famous without any talent and people having genuine talent but are not valued
or appreciated.
We always wonder why some are born with a silver spoon in mouth. Children
of a royal family, for instance, would always make others jealous. They may
choose to live wealthily without having to do anything when they grow up,
being mere caretakers of their huge ancestral property. Similar is the case of
royalty income which benefits even the children of talented people in
professions like singing and writing. Some other people too are very lucky, or
we can say that stars favour them. They accidentally find hidden treasures or
win tottery and become rich. Their lifestyle, then, makes them famous. This is
the power of luck! Without it favouring, many geniuses (scientists,
archaeologists etc.) die an anonymous death without meeting success even
after a plenty of researches.
Many rags to riches stories of celebrities like J K Rowling and Oprah Winfrey,
on the other hand, make us believe in success due to talent. Then, why every
talented person is not rich and famous? Firstly, not every talented person
targets fame and riches. For those who were ambitious enough to aim for it but
could not achieve may have failed due to reasons like not getting appropriate
exposure, not having knowledge to market the talent, suffering mass
opposition, having bad luck, missing opportunities, inability to use current
technology and so on. Thus, talent needs to club with a positive attitude, hard
work and the support of surroundings for real success.
I think talent always stands a chance to kiss success in the form of name, fame
and money, but without talent, it is pure luck that brings such success and it
can only be short-term as the person will soon be forgotten.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-01 | selenophile | 82 | view |
- There is a moral necessity today for the richer countries of the world top help the poorer countries develop in terms of feeding the population education and health care 41
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 11
- The car is possibly the most convenient and popular way of getting from A to B However due to its impact on environment and the risk it poses to pedestrians and motorists government should take urgent steps to reduce our dependency on this mode of transpo 56
- The diagram below shows the product life cycle of the car 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, thus, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05466237942 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5216097499 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64308681672 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8397979781 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24261807784 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704173810563 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704787616441 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604674410367 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756863519466 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.