In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work and
communicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive or negative development?
In this day and ages, the Internet has revolutionized people’s lives that enabled them to carry out various tasks without direct communication. Whether this progress brings more harm than good is a debatable issue. I, personally, believe its drawbacks are greater.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that this development is beneficial to many people. Firstly, that people can do shopping, work from home and keep in contact with loved ones on the Internet platform can save their valuable time. Without wasting time going to stores in person, a customer, from their home comfort, can easily order his desired items just after some mouse clicks and receive them within one or two days. Secondly, the Internet has facilitated international trading, which has fostered the progress of globalization and integration. This is because the executives in multi-national companies can supervise and monitor their operation across the globe via the Internet, ensuring a smooth business flow. A telling example is Apple, a technology giant in smartphones, which has achieved huge successes in faraway countries such as China and Vietnam.
I am inclined to the view that the Internet’s downsides could be hardly unarguable.
There might be an accelerating people’s dependence on the Internet, thus they are likely to immerse themselves in a virtual world rather than relating to real communities. As a result, an increase in problems, including social isolation and health disorders, such as depression or autism, is expected. More seriously, the Internet development could lead to more and more online crimes, which adversely influenced the society. In fact, bullying on social networks has been alarming, in which biased information about someone can be transmitted quickly and consequently, he may receive tons of vulgar comments, interfering his personal life.
In conclusion, despite enormous benefits of the Internet, the government should take steps to mitigate its drawbacks, ensuring a better technological world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
- Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular.Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.What are your opinions in this? 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The table below the worldwide market share of the notebook computer markets for manufacturers in the year 2006, 2007 and 2014 78
- the charts below show the distribution of employment in agriculture, industry and services in three countries in 1980 and a prediction to 2020. 84
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ous tasks without direct communication. Whether this progress brings more harm than goo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54019292605 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10052889562 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659163987138 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9567464169 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.866666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133720386249 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387219487891 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365455806592 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622484676154 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303970221602 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.