More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or “remotely” rather than going into an office each day.
Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent decades, the booming of technology brought more conveniences for all strata and one of the most benefits is that accelerating enterprises enable their staff to perform jobs at their homes instead of going to offices on a daily basis. As far as I am concerned, there are advantages of this trend than its drawbacks. In the following essay, I will present reasons to demonstrate my opinions.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that living in the technological era causes a number of disadvantages to people, especially employees. In particular, telecommunicating is a key contributing factor behind the deteriorating sense of community and limit interaction between workers with their colleagues because these individuals have a tendency to use the cutting edge devices such as mobiles, laptops, tablets to communicate with others rather than face-to-face contact. Therefore their communicational skill may be reduced and they feel to be isolated in the crowd, which means the mentioned issue leads to widening the distance between them and other members of the society, even their relations.
On the other hand, in spite of obvious negatives of this phenomenon, however, its perks play a vital role which contributes to employees, their firms and the community. Firstly, the rise in the abundance of workers who telework for organizations not only helps themselves and their companies to save time and the cost for the commute from and to their house but also has a flexible schedule. As a result, these people have more free time for their favor and study in order to gain more qualifications which pave the way for their career path. Secondly, the more people telecommunicate the more traffic problems might be decreased since working at home results in the traveling frequency and the number of vehicles on the road will be declined. Thus, the amount of gas emission of means of transportation is also reduced.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the benefits stem from teleworking are greater than its demerits. Hence, the government should enact a suitable policy to stimulate workers remotely.
- Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- Most of the world’s urgent problems are caused by over-population. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skill What are the causes and suggest possible solutions 89
- Computers are being more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education.To what extents do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...thers rather than face-to-face contact. Therefore their communicational skill may be redu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...companies to save time and the cost for the commute from and to their house but also has a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15743440233 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05788794984 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606413994169 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5618859611 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3076923077 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228113937652 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661389697379 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475066103836 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121264515082 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052647237291 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.