More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news. They get news about the world through the Internet. Is this a positive or negative development?
Reading newspapers or watching TV channels as a source of information is now considered a thing of the past, as people can gain news on the internet. While acknowledging the potential drawbacks of this trend, I would argue that this is generally a favorable development.
Granted, opponents of gaining news online may cite the potential misinformation on the virtual platforms since inauthentic and unverified information can easily be uploaded without difficulties. If people were to utilize this information and disseminate it widely, this can cause such dangerous circumstances. This danger manifests itself starkly in the Covid-19 pandemic where people continuously said that this virus cannot be cured and lead to death quickly, engendering anxiety among societies. However, it is important to note that the government has imposed laws associated with the authenticity and validity of information floating around the internet, ensuring that news approaching people will be of high quality. In tandem with this, people proactively choosing and deciding which information to read is also crucial.
The argument in favor of r the internet as a reservoir of information as advantageous is further strengthened by its unparalleled conveniences offered. Utilizing phones or computers to keep abreast of what is going on around the world can help people save money, which should have been spent on purchasing newspapers. By the same token, it can also eliminate the need to wait for TV programs with fixed schedules, thereby saving a considerable amount of time and ensuring that people can gain sufficient information. If people long for news through television channels, they have to remember the time and the channels to achieve that aim, which is sometimes challenging for people, let alone those who are absent-minded and failing to meet that request can hardly give them another chance to watch these programs, depriving them of the opportunity to be fully informed.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for advocating the traditional ways of learning news, I would contend that the benefits it offers are more significant, given its roles as a time and money saver.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 70 | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- In many countries many children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people believe that the government has the responsibility to deal with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- New technologies present children with new possibilities and potential danger Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of technology on children in todays society 89
- Some people argue that technological advancements particularly in the field of artificial intelligence will eventually lead to widespread unemployment as machines and robots take over jobs Others believe that these advancements will create new job opportu 84
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sseminate it widely, this can cause such dangerous circumstances. This danger man...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, while, in conclusion, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3918128655 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11268811986 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608187134503 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5248748304 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223519251301 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798721552998 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506787101025 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137100255136 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451133759597 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.