Some people argue that technological advancements, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence, will eventually lead to widespread unemployment as machines and robots take over jobs. Others believe that these advancements will create new job opportunities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is sometimes argued that advances in technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, will result in a scenerio, where countless jobs are at stake due to the dominance of machines and robots. However, other people hold the opposing view that these positive transformations will open doors to more job opportunities. This essay will first closely examine both viewpoints before concluding that I agree with the latter.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people advocate the obsolescence of jobs on account of AI. Perhaps the chief rational would be that AI can perform, countless human tasks. For example, many businesses in Vietnam are adopting chatbots, based on the development of artificial intelligence, acting as customer service agents. Buyers can easily communicate with them to know more about the products or even problems they are having with what they have purchased. These inquiries can be effectively tackled by AI, which is harder for humans to do so. That can also be said about other jobs requiring repetition such as data entry, routine manufacturing and assembly, and automated testing in software development. However, proponents of this perspective fail to factor in other fields that demand human qualities, creativity, emotional intelligence, or complex decision-making. They, of course, cannot work as therapist, whose jobs require mutual understanding between patients and doctors despite its advancements.
On the other hand, I side with those who advocate the idea of AI opening up a world of job opportunities. When AI become increasingly thriving in the world, entirely new jobs and industries are created as a result. These jobs related to AI may include AI specialists, who are knowledgeable about how AI works and funtions; data scientists, who analyze and interpret complex sets of information to help organizations make informed decision. Aside from this, as AI advances, jobs requiring people to maintain, enhance the artificial intelligence system to make it more effective in functioning. This, as a result, would generally improve users’ experiences, leading to more satisfied results. In light of the unprecedented development of AI, people nowadays need training AI-related skills such as how to ask them for help, how to utilize to make it a powerful tool for education. That is the reason why jobs like AI trainers, AI explainability specialists, and AI safety engineers are brought into being. Given these factors, the belief that AI will create more job opportunities seem perfectly justifiable.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for extolling the idea of AI rendering many jobs obsolete, I would contend that AI bring about jobs is generally more appealing, considering its inability to perform job concerning human qualities and real-life jobs created by the proliferation of robots and machines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
- Question The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What are the reasons for the growth of overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 89
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In the past important knowledge about history and culture was stored in museums However today people can see everything on the internet without paying any money Therefore we no longer need museums To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statemen 84
- Online learning do pros outweigh cons 84
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability But some people believe there are many factors that contribute to success at sports 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45964125561 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22197621477 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576233183857 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4254306368 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240680237473 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776674131094 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668190181867 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166689170192 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739412186125 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.