More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo

Nowadays, many of highly qualified personnel travel from their countries to work in a better environment. There is a discussion when one thinks, migration is a natural habit when other seem it as a robbery of specialised individuals by wealthy countries. I agree with people migration of qualified people into rich territories as everybody deserves a good lifestyle.

Since ever, people moving their homes and families to have a better life, some of them even travel from one hemisphere to another. It is a natural habit and it could not be surprising that many of highly trained people taking a risk to leave their homelands and move to the country, where their life will be easier and their qualifications recognised.

To provide an example. Hospitals and medical centres are desperate for nursing staff, however, nurse profession is highly appreciated by the public, their salary does not reflect their quality and care provided. For these reasons, nurses seeking opportunity in countries such a Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Australia or New Zealand, where they will be recognised in all aspects. There are no doubts, that countries from where nursing professionals leaving from, losing qualified workforce, however, everybody wants to be awarded.

To conclude, despite losing of qualified staff from non-wealthy counties, qualified people benefit from international working opportunities, providing a high quality of work to society in exchange for better lifestyle.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47391304348 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94423598236 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613043478261 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3103010114 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.9 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199098257943 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818716485268 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656221384894 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124623597293 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292256283944 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.