Most medical doctors want to work in cities where they will make a lot of money. Yet in many rural areas there are not enough doctors. What are the reasons for this problem? How can it be solved?
In contemporary, lots of doctors desire that they could go to work in urban areas instead of countryside. This is a controversial problem so that experts have to endeavor to deal with this. There are many causes of this problem, as I mention below.
Initially, there is a lack of facilities in remote areas. Excellent doctors tend to find an opportunity to work at a reputation hospital with cutting-edge medical equipment, in which they can show their extensive knowledge and skills. For instance, on the condition that doctors have to work in a small health center in rural areas, they could not implement a complex operation because of facilities shortage. They are not able to enrich their expertise as there are a few excellent colleagues. Moreover, life's standard in the countryside is another reason why rural areas lack doctors. Working in urban areas means that doctors could earn high-income annually and have a comfortable life.
Therefore, it is essential to tackle this trouble. One of resolutions is to develop infrastructure in the countryside. The government should construct more large hospitals and spend money on modern facilities in there. Enlarging roads connect cities to remote areas can also help to attract excellent doctors to move to the countryside. For example, when the traffic system upgrades, doctors can commute to work daily in a shorter time, even if they live in places that are far from their workplaces. Another efficient method that can lure excellent experts is to grow the salary for the countryside's doctors. The government should use the public budget for supporting local hospitals to pay their employees' salaries.
To sum up, the lack of doctors in rural areas is a serious problem caused by many factors. Handling this trouble is a necessary task in recent years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | Shashanka | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | Shashanka | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | diepanh142 | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | nguyenngocnga7916 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...al areas lack doctors. Working in urban areas means that doctors could earn high-inco...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10437710438 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86561856744 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5190897913 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2222222222 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333149440824 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091279289723 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632153527702 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20370801736 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265157386408 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.