Most people take interviews to select a person for a job. What are other ways? Which is the best way of selection?
How to select only the most suitable employees out of an immense pool of them? This question has been puzzling employers for a long time now, but most of them are still relying heavily on interviewing job applicants. While there are some options that they can apply to pick the right workers, I personally believe that conducting interviews is by far the most effective method of selection.
The first alternative to interviews while recruiting would be requiring recommendation letters. These references can be obtained from 2 sources: previous employers can help new managers and bosses to form an understanding on a potential candidate's previous work experience, their attitudes and even personality based on feedback, and an educational institution, such as a college or a university, that they have graduated, providing further objective opinion about the job applicant. Another way is designing personality and aptitude tests. By doing so, recruiters can test a subject's knowledge and personality theory-wise. However, these tests must be compiled by professionals like head specialists and reputed psychologists so that results obtained are valid and accurate.
In my opinion, however, conducting interviews is still the most effective method for recruitments. The principal reason for this is that interviewing is a relatively faster process. Unlike reading references or spending time on checking an applicant’s personality and knowledge, interviews can be conducted in approximately 15 minutes, allowing the selection team to decide instantaneously. Moreover, interviewing tends to be more reliable than other alternatives. This is because recommendation letters may be biased or can be faked, while aptitude and psychology tests may fail to produce accurate results or have a high chance of cheating. During interviews, though, a person’s emotions, behavior, personality and attitude can be determined straightforwardly through face-to-face interaction.
Overall, I believe the most optimal way of filling a vacancy is through conducting interviews for it is time-efficient and sophisticated. Alternatives to doing so are less likely to be effective due to problems about reliability as well as objectivity.
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 80
- Around the world more adults can work from home and more children can study from home as computer technologies become cheaper and more accessible Do you think it is a positive or negative development for society 78
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that all school students should learn a foreign language while others think that students should not be required to learn it if they do not have talent for it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider the rich richer and the poor even poorer What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'candidate'?
Suggestion: candidate
...to form an understanding on a potential candidates previous work experience, their attitud...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'subjects'' or 'subject's'?
Suggestion: subjects'; subject's
...sts. By doing so, recruiters can test a subjects knowledge and personality theory-wise. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74320241692 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47393141132 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604229607251 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1374584751 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221677249162 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784608247463 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560201616394 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139531216147 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391033746216 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'candidate'?
Suggestion: candidate
...to form an understanding on a potential candidates previous work experience, their attitud...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'subjects'' or 'subject's'?
Suggestion: subjects'; subject's
...sts. By doing so, recruiters can test a subjects knowledge and personality theory-wise. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74320241692 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47393141132 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604229607251 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1374584751 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221677249162 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784608247463 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560201616394 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139531216147 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391033746216 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.