The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem.
It is now common to hear that many people are migrating from the rural areas to the mega citis for better work opportunities. However, this transition can lead to a couple of drawbacks in several aspects in both places. This essay will outline the problems and propose some remedies to reduce this matter.
The negative feature of migration are obvious. Owing to the increasing number of people moving towards metropolis, the countryside can meet the shortage of agricultural workers. This means that the production can be quite slow and not enough for the consumption of dwellers in the rural areas and even cities. At the same time, the population in the mega cities is incontrollable due to this matter. Overpopulation exacerbates the lack of resources which can make people moving from countryside facing with expensive accommodation and other demands of life.
To solve such issues, there are several approaches must be carried out to address this pressing concern. One feasible measure that should be taken into consideration is the government must encourage large scale industries or factories to relocate there to create more job opportunities. This could attract the residents to stay and work in the agricultural areas. Another effective measure to be taken is improve the transportation system connecting rural areas to big cities and make it affordable. The purpose of this remedies is let people can comeback their home after working in the metropolis.
In brief, as more individuals are moving from agricultural areas to big cities caused many disadvantages to the environment, economy and living standard of the people. But these problems can be tackled if the authorities start taking some practical to alleviate it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | roopdeep | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | duchuyb1909033 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | lovepreet000 | 38 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 67
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 67
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 84
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...nother effective measure to be taken is improve the transportation system connecting ru...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... and make it affordable. The purpose of this remedies is let people can comeback the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, as to, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27338129496 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9687658591 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579136690647 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4413443437 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86666666667 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360819816052 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102498078075 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406522522272 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209259579461 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227981478914 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.