Multicultural societies, where people of different ethnic groups live together can bring more benefits than drawbacks to a society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some others proposed that societies have multiculturalism from those who are coming from different countries that are living alongside together, in which, it will make more effective to positive. Along with that, this is certain that will be contributing the richness of a society, what they cannot expect. Looking from an overall perspective, this is further advantageous to the community to gearing towards the society is being better.
One evident good side of social matters in terms of political, economic, or the development of human beings are in sharing the whole community. What it is mean that is the majority of migrants from distinct cultural backgrounds are gathering into their own country, where it is exchanged the knowledge, the latest technology, and experts by their comprehending. Indeed, Vietnam is one of the countries which are embargoed for a long time, after abolishing the restricted rules, the country is now thriving by trading cargoes between other countries. In addition, the government are always encouraged many global companies in what those are set up their companies in Vietnam. Thanks to cooperating multi-societies, many people who are living there with its combined that could be obtaining to opportunity career.
What is more, it is irrefutable that most of us are understanding of specialized religions and their culture before moving into other countries. When they are working on similar tasks in the firm with locals’ people, perhaps the competition will be pushing off each one. Whereby, there are more valuable meaningful with its boosting the spirit in the workplace. As a consequence, the production will be along with the highest profits and are surely taken more than ever developing. Many people are gradual open-minded to those who are in another country and are felt that tolerant of other’s people customs and religions. Putting forwards to mutually-cooperative together between nations which are widely credited among the community.
In conclusion, it is no more pluses to attract more immigrants from overseas, whether residents are accepting of this or not. Looking at the upside, people will be having to be convinced by this matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-28 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
- The maps below show changes in a local theatre in England in 2010 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram presents the process of producing smoked fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Many countries construct modern buildings to give good view of towns and cities Some people say that countries make new buildings with traditional style to preserve their culture as part of their identity Agree or disagree 83
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng towards the society is being better. One evident good side of social matters ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...more, it is irrefutable that most of us are understanding of specialized religions and their cult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, in addition, in conclusion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 13.1623246493 266% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34870317003 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01921305996 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582132564841 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7246413558 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137198922202 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424951740981 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336725450937 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839385843845 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318539135324 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.