In the new millennium by the advent of smartphone almost every sphere of human lives have been affected in some ways
In the new millennium by the advent of smartphone almost every sphere of human lives have been affected in some ways. In such a context, some people, unlike many others, aver that everybody irrespective of their gender and occupation should always be in touch via the cellphone. By my reckoning, the drawbacks of this policy far outweigh the benefits and could harm not only individuals but also the community.
On the one hand, the advocates of utilizing mobile phone at any time mentioning that it is of paramount importance, nowadays, to use a cellphone in order to fulfill employer or other expectations. They claim that being in a touch irrespective of time and day can absorb other people attention and they acclaim you in this regard widely. Therefore, ones may gain respect or financial reward in return.
On the other hand, the opponents assert some cogent reasons for rejecting this idea. The first and foremost reason in this regard is that answering your phone without considering time or day can violate one's privacy significantly which could contribute to many undesirable results. As a case in point, it is widely observed that some businessmen and politicians answering their smartphone even in the mid-night or holidays suffer from constant anxiety and insomnia. In addition to this, by being ready to meet other expectations and neglecting your own needs, ones may create a wrong expectation among their colleagues or friends.
To sum up, according to the aforementioned remarks, it is crystal clear that answering the work or personal calls without any limitation could lead to devastating problems for the person and originate wrong attitudes in the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-10 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
- The table compares social and economic factors based on the United Nation (UN) statistics in four nations, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994. 84
- The bar chart compares various modes of daily commute including train, car, tube, and bus in three different time spans. 84
- It is true to say that in the new millennium and by the advent of technological devices involving smartphones and security cameras people are being watched constantly. 78
- It is true to say that the usage of fast food could contribute to devastating health problems 73
- Some people support the idea of imposing taxes on fossil fuels ( oil, coal, and gas) in order to reduce energy consumption. Others disagree with this approach.Consider the debate and its arguments, and come to your own conclusion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...m you in this regard widely. Therefore, ones may gain respect or financial reward in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...out considering time or day can violate ones privacy significantly which could contr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ctations and neglecting your own needs, ones may create a wrong expectation among th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14598540146 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86322184264 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613138686131 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4454195738 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.181818182 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180853821138 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917042631041 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.246481854829 0.0667982634062 369% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111320188502 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168492866757 0.056905535591 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.