Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, in order to test the effectiveness of medical products before human use, a large number of animal experimentation is implemented. Although these experiments bring humans many benefits, I believe that scientists should emphasize more on ethical aspects and find alternative methods for drug testing.
In consideration of the biomedical aspect, there might be certain reasons why the researchers still do animal experiments. First, they are crucial for scientists’ improved understanding of human biology and health. For example, by studying model organisms, people have a clear understanding of the mechanism of the diseases. Therefore, they can develop new treatments, such as organ transplantation or stem cell. Furthermore, experiments involving animals are required for developing new medicines. Specifically, before being approved by the authority and launching, the drugs must be tested for their toxicity as well as effectiveness through conducting these trials.
On the other hand, testing on animals is believed to be a cruel, unethical, and pointless action. First, no matter how closely related the creatures are, their genome and physiological characteristics are still different from those of humans. To be more detailed, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs are not similar between individuals, so the medicines passing tests in animals may fail in the following clinical trials. Furthermore, there are alternative tests to qualify drugs. For example, scientists can alternative methods, such as in vitro model, to test medicine which provides faster and more accurate results. Last but not least, activists often argue that humans have no right to subject animals to trauma.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 84
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world s resources Do you agree or disagree 67
- New parents should attend parenting courses to learn how to bring up their children well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed However some people think that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s of medical products before human use, a large number of animal experimentation is implemented. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6975088968 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27914267564 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3103500683 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260762053657 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844751349727 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610180544295 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155986076687 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00676208742282 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.