Nowadays businesses face problems with new employees who just finished their education and lack some interpersonal skills such as the ability to work in a team. What do you think is the main cause of the problem? How can it be resolved?
Many companies are facing issues with some fresh employees who have the inability to work as a team and poor interpersonal relationships among the workers. The main reason behind this is the workplace atmosphere and lack of communication. Whereas it can be tackled by proper orientation and support from the senior employees.
To begin with, the lack of a relational approach is mainly due to improper managerial functions and cooperation. There are many organizations that consider the new representatives are just freshers and they do not believe in them doing major work. They just instructed them to do some minor things and not allow them to enter into serious discussions. Similarly, most of the universities and colleges are concentrated more on academic performances rather than skills and team goals. For instance, university grades are the most important need for every recruiter and sometimes prestigious issues for the colleges too.
nevertheless, every industries can mitigate this issues with the proper awareness and orientation program to new commers. Provide appropriate knowledge regarding the importance and benefits of team works. employer and other employees help them to participate every assignments and projects. In addition, universities concentrate equally on grades and skills of every students and add team projects and assignments in the curriculum.
To sum up, it is often complaint about the organizations regarding the poor relationship inside the workplace. New representatives might have the problem related to mingling and joinining other employees and institutions can develop many programmes and support to reduce this imoact.
- many people argue that in order to improve the quality of education high school students are encouraged to comment or even criticize their teachers others believe that this will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom discuss both perspect 73
- the graph below shows the number of houses constructed in particular part of the UK and also shows prediction of 2020 66
- the chart below show the film participation in Australia and also shows the typical film trips of different age groups from 1996 to 2000 take a look at the data and select and announce key highlights 79
- personal satisfaction is declining in large urban communities what can be the explanation behind this what significant progress can be made to determine this issue 73
- the accompanying pie illustrations show the use of web based social networking y people in Australia in 2011 and 2014 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...tigious issues for the colleges too. nevertheless, every industries can mitigate this iss...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employer
... importance and benefits of team works. employer and other employees help them to partic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ects and assignments in the curriculum. To sum up, it is often complaint about t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, for instance, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65476190476 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20273989452 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59126984127 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3955344194 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233798585025 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692910134987 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508311684013 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13174019307 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502465468127 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.