Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this is a bad example to adolescents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In these days and ages, it is true that some celebrities are now known for their lavish lifestyles rather than their contributions to society. Some feel that this tendency has a negative impact on young people. I partly consider that view.
On the one hand, well-known persons have an impact on the community, particularly their followers. Many influences, especially their idols who they consider role models, might affect a teenager's personality and conduct during puberty. Take, for example, obsessive fans. When they see their idols' exotic and affluent lifestyles, they fight to mimic and own similar goods, despite their financial constraints. This promotes materialistic lives, which can have both emotional and physical consequences for impressionable teens.
However, it is not the flashy lifestyle of superstars that is to blame for this problem. Clearly, the family and nurture environment, rather than celebrities' flashy lifestyles, have a greater influence on influencing children's behavior. It is critical for everyone to learn to live within their means and to adhere to an ethical code of conduct. In addition, there are at least as many celebrities whose achievements qualify them as outstanding role models for children. They show a lot of effort, determination, and ambition, all of which are necessary for someone to be truly successful in their chosen industry.
To summarize, while celebrities have an impact on the community, blaming them for the misdeeds of their young fans is incorrect. Each person should have their own moral convictions to lead them through life, and no one should be expected to follow in the
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | LUCIALUSO | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | Hoang Mung | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | Hoang Mung | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-29 | nfseg | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the be 73
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortage and what could be done to tackle the problem 49
- Discuss the pros and cons for children of watching television 73
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays some parents put a lot of pressure on their children What is the reason for doing that Is this a positive or negative development for the children 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...ey consider role models, might affect a teenagers personality and conduct during puberty....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... one should be expected to follow in the
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, at least, for example, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3667953668 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95243368867 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.002702604 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273092444633 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090925145014 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524534383603 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172785369036 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036224424779 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.