Nowadays the differences between countries are becoming less evident because people following the same media Do the advantage of this trend outweigh the disadvantage

Essay topics:

Nowadays the differences between countries are becoming less evident because people following the same media. Do the advantage of this trend outweigh the disadvantage.

In this contemporary life, the culture and transportation or technology are becoming less change in different countries because people following and using the same media. This essay will examine both sides advantage and disadvantage before conclusion is drawn.
In regard to communication on human. First, in this modern life we have many technology devices such as mobile phone,tablet or computer are help people to keep in touch with their friends or family, especially elder people. By using Internet and social media including Facebook, Instagram or Twitter are believed to equalize communication and financial among young people adolescents regardless of their family background. This financial support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall communication rate of lower income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society.Second, people using the same media would probably result in a higher supply of qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. Foremost, people using the same social media can increase the percentage of faster working by calling and texting. In fact, it is acknowledged that communication and skilled is imperative to foster economic growth and development technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant in the minor benefits once if people just used one media. First, people use one social media would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from other media or fees, companies could become over-reliant on the date budget, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, using the same platform would tempt many young people including those who are not working pursuits or show no interest in protect ourselves information and especially they are always running a bad trends and influence other people or more noise population, and thereby adding great burdens for company’s activities and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more social paths and reduce the pollution.
In conclusion, this argument have some disadvantages but from my perspective, this phenomenon can be justified from certain angles, but its potential coexist and government should consider for solution in the future.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-24 Trần Ánh Vy 89 view
Essays by user Trần Ánh Vy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
... technology devices such as mobile phone,tablet or computer are help people to ke...
^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'one medium', 'a medium', or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: one medium; a medium; media
...minor benefits once if people just used one media. First, people use one social media wou...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62601626016 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97496549958 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.776373009 49.4020404114 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.692307692 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3846153846 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25360949853 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916762159304 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963144360514 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177972396139 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129011635224 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.