Nowadays, distance-learning programs are such common thing for us, but some people argue that they're not as good as those by attending in a college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the development of modern technology, remote-learning programs have gained its reputation in the past decades. People nowadays can acquire the latest knowledge through the internet, television and videos. However, there are also many people worrying about whether the new form of education can have the same effects compared to studying in person. In my view, such a novel way of learning enables many people to learn more flexibly, but it has its drawbacks.
Firstly, people can arrange their learning schedule more flexibly by attending distance-learning. For example, people who have employment may be busy in some specific time period, such as the holidays seasons for supermarket clerks. Previously, due to their inflexible working time, limited choices are available for these working people to participate a professional education program. However, after the emerge of remote-learning, they can learn whenever they have time.
In addition, modern technology makes the communication between teachers and students more smoothly. When receiving traditional education, student normally only have chance to see their teachers in class, and thus most of them can not receive proper instructions after class. On the contrary, with the technique provided by online education programs, such as IM applications, course work evaluation system, students and online lecturers have easier ways to communicate. Therefore, students will have a more solid understanding about the things they learn.
However, one of the drawbacks about distance-learning is that it is normally not systematically organised compared to traditional education. When enrolling in a college, the education plan is evaluated by professional educators. Students are more likely to master a more comprehensive knowledge system by receiving more professional education. In contrast, remote-education is dispersive and people can only learn a certain subject once at a time.
In sum, distance-learning helps people learn more flexibly and boost learning efficiency by offering easier communications between students and teachers. Nevertheless, people should not anticipate too much on the novel education form, because it is hard for them to build a comprehensive knowledge system by receiving remote-education.
- Some people think schools should only teach students academic subjects Others think schools should also teach students how to discriminate between right and wrong Discuss both views and give your own opinion 93
- TPO-20:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell."Two years ago, the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. During the past two years, tourism in Ocean View has increased, new bu 62
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ional education program. However, after the emerge of remote-learning, they can learn when...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84179104478 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36832836866 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564179104478 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6472257767 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.722222222 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167549713116 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599777163821 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442152736473 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104118689845 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516225242237 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.