Nowadays , distance- learning programs have gained in popularity , but some people argue that online courses can never be taken as good as those taken at college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, learning system by online type became the most eminent, however, not all people think that through this method have a good capability than study interface. I totally agree with this notion and think that study at education centre more effective than online.
First of all, majority of student can't understand what a teacher teaching. In other words, when learning system use online and done remotely it will affect the understanding for students, one of the causes is the lack of communication that is intertwined. Futhermore, students are forced to understand the material conveyed by the teacher, resulting in difficulty in remembering the previous material, as a result making students continue to experience failure in understanding the material of the topic. For instance, the entry of covid-19 in Indonesia made all learning systems switch from offline to online, and resulted in instability in the learning process as a result of which many students complained about the decline in GPA due to not understanding the online learning being carried out. That's why the type of online learning is not efficient and it's hard to student know about all courses.
Secondly, Making students even more lazy and indifferent to the lessons being delivered. Even if learning methods are conducted through online applications and can see the activities of students, it does not guarantee the effectiveness of the learning. Moreover, Many people think that through online learning system can make students more active, but in fact students prefer to turn off the sound and camera mode and leave the study room. For example, Zoom is an application that is widely used by students in Indonesia and through this application many students turn off the camera and sound so that it makes them free to do anything, sometimes they do other activities and leave their PC or mobile phone in the study room. Thus, strategic by online learning is not recommended for teaching student because the consequence of this method is negative.
To conclude, to arouse the intelligence of student should be have the best way and the only strategic was provided not efficient and can't rising knowledge every student only minority of people can adjust with the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-17 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 67 | view |
- The digram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 73
- Some people believe that children s leisure time activities must be educational otherwise they are waste of their time To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better to spend on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ine. First of all, majority of student cant understand what a teacher teaching. In ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 779, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to be'.
Suggestion: to be
...o not understanding the online learning being carried out. Thats why the type of onli...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 798, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... the online learning being carried out. Thats why the type of online learning is not ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had'?
Suggestion: had
...e the intelligence of student should be have the best way and the only strategic was...
^^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...trategic was provided not efficient and cant rising knowledge every student only min...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1698630137 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77138421434 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517808219178 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5213048509 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.153846154 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128938907224 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541129289914 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274201059851 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841561607842 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147465983009 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.