Nowadays, it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, many companies are able to make film because the advancement of digital technology. Some group of people believed that it a positive move but some group think the opposite. With me, I believed this has both aspects.
On one hand, this is a sign of a state-of-the-art society. Today, people use smart phone for everything and entertainment prevails. So most of small companies take advantage form that to earn extra income by participating in the film industry. And use social media as a tool to spread it to get the attention of everyone and mainly is young generation who can bring for them abundant economic resources. For instance, in Facebook, it has a lot short video about somebody’s life or about their love. If search it in the internet, the true is there's an entire company behind those short clips. And everyone like that, so they can take money from the social networking site.
On the other hand, that small companies just concentrate on earning money but they do not know the harm of that. If young people do not like their video, they will have lost their money. Not only that, but the short videos also destroy the mind of the young people. Because their mind cannot focus on something too long. Each video just one or two minutes long, and if they watch that kind of videos for a long time, the brain will get used to it.
In conclusion, in cutting-edge of this social, every companies can make film.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
- Some people think that young people should follow the traditions of the society Others think young people are free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people believe that teaching music in schools is a vital part of growing up and the human experience whilst others believe that teaching music in schools is a waste of time and resources Discuss both the views and give your own opinion 68
- Many employers believe that good social skills are as important as good qualifications to succeed in a job so they are employing people who are with good social skills To what extent do you agree or disagree job 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... search it in the internet, the true is theres an entire company behind those short cl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o destroy the mind of the young people. Because their mind cannot focus on something to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66798418972 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54799421583 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1177768502 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.8125 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161804286593 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551410088197 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738797402518 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129993145948 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795643123522 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... search it in the internet, the true is theres an entire company behind those short cl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o destroy the mind of the young people. Because their mind cannot focus on something to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66798418972 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54799421583 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1177768502 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.8125 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161804286593 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551410088197 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738797402518 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129993145948 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795643123522 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.