Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In today’s cosmopolitan world, it is not uncommon to find major cities or countries filling up with immigrants. Although this has increased a closer interaction between people and cultures, governments would struggle to create peace amid people. As far as I am concerned, the authorities can establish stricter laws to protect the foreigners and immerse different cultures through education.
To begin with, anti-discrimination legislation can protect immigrants from being treated unfairly. In the first place, governments could launch a nationwide agreement to ensure that immigrants could receive equal benefits as the indigenous people. For instance, increasing the job opportunities along with certain medical insurance is the least standard that an immigrant could have. Moreover, the host country should have some stringent laws to protect people from aggression or prejudice so that, should an immigrant face terrible attitudes, they have some protection. By ensuring people feel safe the country shows that it is civilized and promotes integration.
Besides that, governments should propose more worldwide history and culture lessons. In this regard, children can have the opportunities to learn more about different cultures around the world, hence feeling more tolerant and opening their minds to accept the differences between customs. Furthermore, this practice does not stop at the local children but can extend to the immigrants who should be allowed to learn more about the host country through free language and culture programs. By acquiring the language and knowledge about the culture, they will be able to integrate more easily and comfortably without necessarily losing their own identity.
Admittedly, there is an obstacle that governments could face. Accordingly, an increase in the number of immigrants could make the locals uncomfortable. To put this further, the native citizens would be worried about losing their jobs to the hand of the foreigners. However, I believe that this would be a chance for the natives to learn and innovate themselves more to compete with the immigrants. Besides that, the host country should also make sure that its citizens have job security so that they would not be upset about their new neighbors.
To recapitulate, social frictions can happen anywhere when there are diversities, but there are many ways that the government can ensure harmonious living amongst its citizen. In order to build unity and prosperity, the government can take steps like enacting anti-discrimination laws and insisting on more cultural lessons for both the natives and the immigrants. Consequently, they would both live together despite their differences in language and culture.
- Mobile phones are considered essential by most people nowadays Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones and state your opinion 89
- Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many cities today What are some of the causes of traffic congestion and what measures can be taken to help reduce it 89
- The graph shows the percentage of people who recycle their rubbish in five countries over 12 years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- Some people believe that it is best to accept aa bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Governments alone cannot be expected to solve environmental problems It is also the responsibility of businesses and individuals to help To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5686746988 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99104581356 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546987951807 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5523118946 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.55 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190495844058 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059955884881 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444045727496 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113178517249 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531096069876 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5686746988 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99104581356 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546987951807 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5523118946 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.55 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190495844058 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059955884881 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444045727496 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113178517249 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531096069876 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.