Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In modern society, the increasing tendency of females working on a full-time basis has drawn much attention, becoming the root of arguments whether the household chores should be divided equally between men and women. From my perspective, this idea is completely justifiable.
On the one hand, the discrepancy between partners may emerge in planning or fulfilling the tasks. There is no denying of the fact that the capability of people is various, depending on the niche of job. As a case in point, if the male is working manually throughout the day, the energy fuels may be exhausted and the housework might left undone, which may lead to the conflicts in the family. To compound, these collisions may not only cause the deadlock in the family relationships, but also the devastating repercussions, in which spouses may consider that they are incompatible and divorce is the best outcome. Thus, sharing household tasks may not always be the best decision on strengthening family ties.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that household work should be split accordingly owing to the benefits of this trend. First of all, creating a verbal arrangement and following it, is an effective way to reinforce the relationships and make the family life more vivid. What is more, this agreement would advantage the individuals positively, by aiding the discipline and well-being, as the vast majority of residents are tend to squander their time after work only by staring at the television or scrolling social media. In this case, being occupied with the housework contributes to their personal fulfillment, thereby inducing the sense of accomplishment, which eventually makes people satisfied and releases the enormous amount of stress. Therefore, the act of dividing the common household tasks such as cooking or cleaning aids people causing personal development in unexplored aspects of life.
In conclusion, although some disagreements between spouses may appear in sharing the chores, I am totally convinced that proper approach would pave the way to improve the relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-04 | Abinaya Velrajan | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | farrukh21 | 89 | view |
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. 78
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. 84
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 84
- The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000 2007 and 2008 2012 88
- The graph below shows the reason for the use of social media by businesses by size of business in 2012 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
..., as the vast majority of residents are tend to squander their time after work only ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28398791541 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99173293435 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616314199396 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0697397493 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.538461538 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141330773194 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452272469997 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427887141162 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838432784152 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480409464044 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.