Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while others think childcare centres provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In these recent decades, there are many families who both parents work out of home. Some of them support the opinion that other members of their family namely grandparents can take care of their children. In contrast, others tend to believe, childcare centers such as kinder gardens can prepare facilities to take care of them. From my point of view, kinder gardens are the better choice in this situation. However, it has both pros and cons. In this essay, the aforementioned will be discussed.
It is certainly obvious that childcare centers can provide the best amenities for the children so it can reduce stress in parents for the future of their children. Moreover, high quality education could be taught in these centers. A recent study in Stanford University illustrates, children who go to kinder garden are able to think better and are more sociable than others who are not go to the kinder garden. Therefore, parents should trust to these centers and enroll their children in a kinder garden.
On the other side of the argument, some parents incline to believe their family members such as grandparents are more trustable for taking care of their children. It depends on the surface of education of their family members because it is extremely important that they have acceptable knowledge to teach to the children. Sometimes grandparents are too old and they are not able to teach to their grandchildren. In addition, they should be familiar with cutting edge methods of education to take care of children. For instance, in these days, children should learn several issues to communicate the world and they need to have relationship with other children in the same ages. Hence, it is not a brilliant idea to spend their most time with family members, particularly their grandparents.
All in all, in spite of the fact that family members are trustable people for parents, they should consider that their children need to spend their time with other children. Furthermore, they need expert teachers to learn them how live and success in their personal life. Personally, I tend to think kinder gardens are appropriate place for children and parents should trust them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 56
- Nowadays many job seekers are finding jobs that force them to move far from their family and friends. Is it a positive or a negative trend? What can be done about it? 67
- NUMEROUS PEOPLE NOWADAYS SUFFER FROM INSOMNIApeople sleep less than before in many countries. why do people sleep less? what effects does it have on individuals and society? 67
- Due the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a dramatic change to people’s lives. Is it a positive or negative development?Give your opinion and examples. 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, suchas the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...e more sociable than others who are not go to the kinder garden. Therefore, parent...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05524861878 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62898681736 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461325966851 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.682150401 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3157894737 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367365261426 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119374326844 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101788563279 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236741574423 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08858295275 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.