Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them and replace them with new ones Why is this happening What problems may it lead to

Are the growing mountains of wastage not ringing an alarm about the upcoming worsening situation of pollution? As a matter of fact, it is being more often than not observed that people do not take a pain to get the thing broken things repaired, instead they prefer to put them in bins. Since this problem stems from the high repair cost of broken things, it greatly affects the environment.

Arguably, the trend of throwing broken things is not increasing for no reason. The main factor responsible behind this practice is the high cost of repairin, as people do not want to spend huge money on the broken products, they prefer to buy new ones. For an instance, a screen of Apple mobile phone involves a huge cost if broken, in other words, the repairing cost is almost equal to a new mobile phone; therefore people give priority to purchasing the new one instead of preparing the broken. On the contrary, in the past owing to the low real income, individuals preferred to get the things required until and unless they did not become completely useless and served no purpose.

That being said, the worst affected from this practice is environment. As broken things are mostly discarded in the areas near the sea, so this also has an adverse impact on the marine life . A painstaking research has had been undertaken by the Aquatic and Marine Department of USA recently, which unfolded the fact that more than one-third of giant Wales consume the huge quantity of non recyclable, and non biodegradable things disposed off by humans in the sea, and die in the span of two years.

To conclude, it can be asserted that, people want to escape the cost of wear and tear of broken things, this trend is threatening our ecology. However, notwithstanding its reprecautions, if people and government collaborate and adopt the best ways to recycle and reuse, it would eventually lead to healthy and environmentally prosperous society; lest good outcomes should be far out of reach.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation of pollution? As a matter of fact, it is being more often than not observed...
^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m the high repair cost of broken things, it greatly affects the environment. A...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly affects the environment. Arguably, the trend of throwing broken things is n...
^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s practice is the high cost of repairin, as people do not want to spend huge mone...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spend huge money on the broken products, they prefer to buy new ones. For an inst...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prefer to buy new ones. For an instance, a screen of Apple mobile phone involves ...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le phone involves a huge cost if broken, in other words, the repairing cost is a...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a huge cost if broken, in other words, the repairing cost is almost equal to a ...
^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. On the contrary, in the past owing to the low real income, individuals prefer...
^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the past owing to the low real income, individuals preferred to get the things ...
^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d served no purpose. That being said, the worst affected from this practice is...
^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...has an adverse impact on the marine life . A painstaking research has had been und...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'painstaking research'.
Suggestion: Painstaking research
... an adverse impact on the marine life . A painstaking research has had been undertaken by the Aquatic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the span of two years. To conclude, it can be asserted that, people want to...
^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To conclude, it can be asserted that, people want to escape the cost of wear a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, third, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83775811209 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68259802802 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6062536576 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.01903807615 299% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244252897643 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820609998005 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526144373922 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134618573387 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490809912028 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.