Nowadays, people waste a lot of food that is bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?

Essay topics:

Nowadays, people waste a lot of food that is bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?

Food is considered to be a basic need for humans to live a long healthy life; however, its wastage has become a controversial issue, thereby buying from the shops and restaurants, and further, the analyzation for the reasons and solutions is to be commenced in the subsequent paragraphs.

The certain causes need to be considered, which seem to be responsible for this wastage of food, the first and foremost is excessive show off of money in the front of others as modern people tend to procure the food from shops and restaurants not only for satisfying their hunger but to attract the attention of others towards themselves in order to show their status; thus, they do not know the importance of food, and therefore, they keep on wasting it. Besides this, the proliferation of discounts on online food is a prominent cause of its wastage because people order more food items, while in actuality they are not able to finish their given food orders; eventually, such kind of choices lead to the wastage of food.

The implementation of different measures may have fruitful results, which are immensely significant to solve the issue of food wastage. Firstly, government has to live up to their responsibility to make the people aware in terms of proper usage of the food, unless they are unable to eat; thereafter, it should rather be served to the poor people than throwing away, it is evident that the poor once does not have a capability to arrange the meal in a whole day. Secondly, people should have to start preparing domestic food because this food is less spicy as compared to outside food.

In conclusion, purchasing food from the shops and restaurants cannot be considered negatively, but its usage should be in an appropriate way to avoid wastage.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-10 kaka singh 56 view
2019-08-24 Hafween 89 view
2019-08-13 akva 61 view
2019-07-20 okaycanada1 56 view
2019-07-12 manas 84 view
Essays by user kaka singh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less they are unable to eat; thereafter, it should rather be served to the poor p...
^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...red negatively, but its usage should be in an appropriate way to avoid wastage.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87707641196 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77328454403 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538205980066 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.2975951904 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.921437461 49.4020404114 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.714285714 106.682146367 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 20.7667163134 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.5714285714 7.06120827912 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384392370115 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182004232341 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626558660778 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215245676717 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736611376872 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.0946893788 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 9.78957915832 286% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.1190380762 190% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.