Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
The amount of sustenance squandered by the whole population reached alarming level.This phenomenon leads to several severe problems, and some feasible solutions will be analyzed.
There are number of negative outcomes from such a behaviour towards the supplies. Primarily, not all consumers acknowledge the importance of food, as it seems to them to have the myriad resources, and no anxiety about it is felt. Although, the availability of food makes an ease to people in some ways, it also brought drawback, since no additional effort is required to fill the stomach. To tackle the common temperament, adults should take into consideration their attitude seriously, and make aware youngsters about the limited reserves of food. Consequently, this measures would induce the eager to maintain the food chain amongst people of all ages, moreover, the sense of responsibility would be rooted.
Another reason for the increasing amount of food left unexploited is seemingly the miscalculations of cooks in the kitchen, which has been ubiquitous for ages. The vast majority of people have no manage over their diet, so whenever the eat in restaurants, they have no imagination about the amount of food they should consume and in what quantity they have to order. As a result, the order is catered with redundancy, and not only the obesity is developed, but the residual food is thrown away, damaging the environment drastically. In this case, the government should implement the standardized regulations, which would control the fixed amount of food. Furthermore, all cooks should purchase the weighing-machine to prepare the eligible amount for all customers. This would led to the correct amount of food consumed, by avoiding the abundance of wasted sustenance.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that devastating outcomes should be prevented by following the suggestions mentioned previously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- Public transportation is a great way to travel, particularly within a metropolis. The Shanghai metro is the most convenient way to get around the city. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Holidays honor people or events. If you could create a new holiday, what person or event would it honor and how would you want people to celebrate it? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- Some people become famous at young age Is it good thing or bad thing 90
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...whole population reached alarming level.This phenomenon leads to several severe prob...
^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... no manage over their diet, so whenever the eat in restaurants, they have no imaginatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...le amount for all customers. This would led to the correct amount of food consumed,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, moreover, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42033898305 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08237196801 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8566907977 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270426977448 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860781558418 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506254399827 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121021562943 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094037575015 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.