Nowadays, researching on animal is ubiquitous. While some people says that it brings many benefits for both humans and animals, so we need make the best of it, the opponents disagree with this idea and argue that it is very cruel. Discuss both view and give opinion.
Everything has two sides and animal testing is not an exception. While proponent contend that both human beings and animals can benefit greatly, so we should take advantage of this, I concur with the people taking issue with others on that point.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why many proponents support animal testing. Firstly, it has yielded substantial benefits for humanity. All mammals, including humans, are descended from common ancestors, and all are biologically similar. Therefore, they probably share the same disorders. In reality, conducting research on animals is frequented in the pharmaceutical industry, and contemporary animal research contributes demonstrably to major advances in medical field. For instance, experiments in which dogs had their pancreases removed led to the discovery of insulin, critical to the safeguarding against the side-effects of diabetes. Secondly, animal testing has also been instrumental in stalling endangered species from extinction. If vaccines were not tested on animals, millions of animals would have succumbed to rabies or distemper diseases.
On the other hand, I would argue that researching on animal has some drawbacks. Firstly, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Discriminating against animals because they do not have the cognitive ability is the same as we do with human beings having mental impairments. According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to forced inhalation or even prolonged periods of physical restraint. Therefore, while suffering is undesirable, it is speciesism to experiment on them but refrain from doing like that on humans. Additionally, alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. With the prevalence of advanced technology, research methodologies have changed fundamentally in many fields. To elaborate, computer models, such as virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures, can predict the toxicity of substances without invasive experiments on animals.
To conclude, while it is true that there is some merits in animal testing, I am inclined to the idea that we should show restraint for what we have done.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-06 | lauranguyen | 89 | view |
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The table compares mobile phone 67
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crimes when set free? What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem? 78
- Some people think that sport has an important role in society Others think it is only a leisure activity for some people Discuss both views and give your opinions 82
- Advertisements bring many negative effects on people and the society. What are these effects? How to solve this problem? 84
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some merits'?
Suggestion: there are some merits
...s. To conclude, while it is true that there is some merits in animal testing, I am inclined to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67069486405 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11561960941 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616314199396 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5679785176 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7894736842 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264400379492 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708641113675 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577136187925 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167105052312 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441430816408 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.