Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree

Some people are widely holding divergent opinions on closing museums and art galleries because it is better to use computers instead. This essay solely agrees with the above idea and will make discussion of how it is inconvenient to directly visit museums or art galleries, and the advantage of using computers for observing historical objects.

First of all, visiting museums and art galleries experiences certain inconveniences for viewers. This is because it is a time-consuming process in which people must take their time to book early tickets or must wait to purchase tickets at the entrance door, resulting in being fatigued and lost interest on the tours. Furthermore, pickpocket also takes advantage of crowded areas to commit a crime in the public without being noticed, due to lack of verification and security. For instance, visitors are always aware of surroundings, and therefore, are not able to fully enjoy their exhibitions.

Moreover, there is no room for doubt that advanced technological devices such as smartphones or computers are relatively handy to visualize historical objects as sitting at home. With the help of technology as well as the Internet, people find themselves free to search for whatever they are interested in with a click of a mouse. Technology also gives people a better insight into historical objects by using software to imitate the movements of dinosaur artifacts. Schools, for example, applying this method to teach children about the lives of endangered species from many previous decades.

In conclusion, thanks to the huge advancements of cutting-edge technologies, visitors would not have to force themselves to be in such harsh situations like waiting to buy tickets or afraid of pickpocket. And it is, therefore, easier for them to safely enjoy their exhibitions at home.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: AFRAID_OF_HEIGHT[1]
Message: The noun should be probably in the plural form: 'pickpockets'.
Suggestion: pickpockets
...ike waiting to buy tickets or afraid of pickpocket. And it is, therefore, easier for them ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3275862069 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00021600491 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610344827586 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0002422474 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238541643282 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818887318437 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846727319346 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140605026361 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106224392782 0.056905535591 187% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.