Media reports place much more emphasis on problematic matters and urgent situations than constructive improvements. some people subscribe to the belief that broadcasting information based on this trend can be deleterious for individuals and society. While I consent to the positive implications of such a trend, I opine that the emergency and problematic reports can be simultaneously associated with negative consequences.
to begin with, the most axiomatic reason is rooted in the fact that consistent exposure to problems and urgent situations broadcast by the media give rise to change in people's vision toward their future. To put it differently, the vast majority of the populace catch sight of the future and plan according to it. Hearing problematic issues about some cases are bound to change and mould their attitude, meanwhile, it is a contributing factor to perplex people, in particular the youth. Take imposed crippling sanctions by dominant countries on Iran about immigration and study abroad as an example; applicant students struggle with depression and disappointment about their upcoming years. This in turn has potential adverse effects on their psychic dimension.
Having said that, however, the media is liable to broadcast information about problems and giving voice to the voiceless. To put it another word, in order to bring in solutions or support, the media is responsible to flow information to the society to find potential people or responsible entities to help and support momentous occasions. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by earthquake happened in the Kermanshah province in Iran. By the suitable covering of news, the charitable institutions' help and support overtook the government's down-to-earth decision. Therefore, irrespective of horrible aspects of such disasters on people's mind, the media play a key role in some extent managing the disaster and citizens suffering from it.
To conclude, I personally take the view that broadcasting the unpleasant news can be both rewarding and problematic for both society and individuals. This is mainly because has a positive impact on their social role and unfortunately negative impact on their decision for their future.
- A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus the proposed new jazz club in Monroe the C Note would have the local market all to itself Plus jazz is extremely popular in Mon 10
- Nowadays, the Olympic Games play less important roles in the world in 21st century. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that the government should not give international aid since they have disadvantaged people like unemployment and homeless in their country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many elderly peopleare no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 78
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends.Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...uations than constructive improvements. some people subscribe to the belief that bro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...sociated with negative consequences. to begin with, the most axiomatic reason i...
^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act on their decision for their future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51603498542 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12310087301 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3525574021 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157223430635 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471013964048 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440942646342 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928841707341 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615612313922 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.