Media reports place much more emphasis on problematic matters and urgent situations than constructive improvements. some people subscribe to the belief that broadcasting information based on this trend can be deleterious for individuals and society. While I consent to the positive implications of such a trend, I opine that the emergency and problematic reports can be simultaneously associated with negative consequences.
to begin with, the most axiomatic reason is rooted in the fact that consistent exposure to problems and urgent situations broadcast by the media give rise to change in people's vision toward their future. To put it differently, the vast majority of the populace catch sight of the future and plan according to it. Hearing problematic issues about some cases are bound to change and mould their attitude, meanwhile, it is a contributing factor to perplex people, in particular the youth. Take imposed crippling sanctions by dominant countries on Iran about immigration and study abroad as an example; applicant students struggle with depression and disappointment about their upcoming years. This in turn has potential adverse effects on their psychic dimension.
Having said that, however, the media is liable to broadcast information about problems and giving voice to the voiceless. To put it another word, in order to bring in solutions or support, the media is responsible to flow information to the society to find potential people or responsible entities to help and support momentous occasions. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by earthquake happened in the Kermanshah province in Iran. By the suitable covering of news, the charitable institutions' help and support overtook the government's down-to-earth decision. Therefore, irrespective of horrible aspects of such disasters on people's mind, the media play a key role in some extent managing the disaster and citizens suffering from it.
To conclude, I personally take the view that broadcasting the unpleasant news can be both rewarding and problematic for both society and individuals. This is mainly because has a positive impact on their social role and unfortunately negative impact on their decision for their future.
- The length of the working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families How far do you agree with this statement 89
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The Internet provides us with information about life and cultures of different countries, and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion 73
- 27 The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lob
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...uations than constructive improvements. some people subscribe to the belief that bro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...sociated with negative consequences. to begin with, the most axiomatic reason i...
^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act on their decision for their future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51603498542 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12310087301 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3525574021 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157223430635 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471013964048 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440942646342 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928841707341 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615612313922 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.