Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about the impacts of media reports on an individual and societal level. While I accept that media coverage regarding problems and urgent issues is inevitable, I still believe that it is posing a major threat to the society and its citizens.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why bad news should not be excluded from media reports. In the first place, the news media could convey thought-provoking messages to its audience by reflecting the status quo of the society in which people are living. These messages may act as warning signals about the potential dangers people may be faced with, thus making them behave or act in more cautious ways. For example, the exposure to regular reports on collision or pileup could help traffic participants raise their awareness about safe driving. This is justifiable as viewers are supposed to be reflective, not passive absorbing the information broadcasted on the mass media. Another justification is that the media reports on emergencies could save lives and reduce casualties. Thanks to the information sent through news media, the authorities could organize evacuation and distribute aid to the needy areas when it is necessary.
On the other hand, sensational news proves to be detrimental when it comes to the audiences' emotions and perceptions towards life. It is true that people are often obsessed with negative news such as terrorism attack, homicides, pandemic or natural calamities. Hence, the news media might take advantage of these preferences to create bad, even shocking and distorted reports in order to draw the attention of the audiences and achieve higher subscription and ratings. This ends up causing panic among the general public as they will become increasingly suspicious and pessimistic about their contemporary society. For these reasons, the excessive reports on negative issues are likely to bring about deleterious implications.
In sum, news media plays a pivotal role in keeping people informed by providing them up-to-the-minute information, and this has been widely acknowledged. Still, I am of the belief that media reports’ focus on negative rather than positive aspects of life could do more harm than good to both individuals and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | marinaph | 85 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Quynh Duong Doan | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | Nguyễn Huy Hoàng | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | Nguyễn Huy Hoàng | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Dungsky57 | 84 | view |
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them Education and job training are better ways to help them Do you agree or disagree 86
- Some people think that schools should teach enroll students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities skills studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- A person spends most of his or her time at the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Sport is big business and high earning cost for professional sport people A lot of companies involved both financially and in other ways Is negative or positive for development sport 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s. This ends up causing panic among the general public as they will become increasingly suspic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, regarding, so, still, thus, while, for example, such as, it is true, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28254847645 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89785647484 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603878116343 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9318366743 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.1875 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194743781284 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622336558599 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684231576166 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135231032841 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722228179146 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.