Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies
rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to
society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, it is worth noting that media news concentrating on social and urgent issues is more popular than positive improvements. Consequently, many have argued that this situation brings more detrimental impacts individually and socially. Although this trend can be beneficial to some extent, I believe that its cripple effects are more significant.
On the one hand, it is justifiable to claim that when the newsfeed is rife with social matters and emergencies, it contributes positively to the damage reduction regarding natural disasters.
For instance, the development of weather forecasts and news programs provides the accurate and latest information on accounts of the change in weather and current affairs. Thanks to the development of weather-forecasting methods, inhabitants, especially those who reside in the most affected areas, will tend towards caution and better preparations for the upcoming natural threats.
On the other hand, focusing on bad news and emergencies might pose specific problems to people’s minds and society. For instance, the thing that terrorist standoffs are climbing makes tourists concerned and more hesitant to decide which country to visit. Meanwhile, from a social perspective, the risk that youngsters may try imitating these social evils is prevailing, especially for those who are not well-educated. Indeed, being rebellious is the first signal, then intimidating others and even committing crimes shortly if they are too affected and obsessed with these harmful reports.
All considered, the adverse impacts of media reports on community predicaments and emergency issues have outweighed their optimistic sides. From my viewpoint, this requires specific addresses, intending to reduce the potential risks and threats to individuals and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | marinaph | 85 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | Quynh Duong Doan | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | Nguyễn Huy Hoàng | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | Nguyễn Huy Hoàng | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | Dungsky57 | 84 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participan 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participan 78
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79323308271 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10535645876 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654135338346 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9285691374 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141882746906 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468151735294 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408588169763 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650617918366 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347622122639 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79323308271 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10535645876 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654135338346 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9285691374 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141882746906 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468151735294 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408588169763 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650617918366 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347622122639 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.