Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely perceived that there should be an equal gender ratio in third-level education institutions. Personally, I wholeheartedly disagree with this position.
To begin with, it seems to be infeasible for universities to enroll the same number of male and female students in every area of study. The truth is that they have to depend on the proportion of prospective students to each major, and the figure for male applicants always differs that for their female counterparts. This can be attributed to the predilection for subject and future profession among two genders. For example, women tend to prefer clerical to managerial work; besides, with lower physical strength and resilience, they are reluctant to embark on blue collar environment. Meanwhile, men usually find themselves better suit jobs that require high capacity of working under pressure or are physically demanding, such as engineer or architect. The personal preferences would therefore make it almost unrealistic for university executives to balance the number of male and female students.
Advocates of gender balance in tertiary education may argue that it is necessary for gender parity and women’s empowerment. They might claim that women nowadays can even outperform men in both male-dominated courses and working environments. However, they ignore the fact that in order to achieve such success, women need to possess great perseverance, diligence and sacrifice their time or relationship. In fact, women in most of cultures all over the globe take more family responsibilities than their spouses, so they have an intention of choosing jobs that can offer them more time for performing caregiving tasks. There is also a traditional belief that man makes house, woman makes home. For this reason, a nine-to-five job can not only warrant gender equity but can also give female workers more time to take care of their family. This long-standing perception is thus a determiner for difference in subject options by two sexes when they enter post-secondary education.
In sum, for the reasons mentioned above, I would contend that the idea of enrolling equal number of male and female students in every university course is not practical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extend do you agree or disagree 95
- Young people are now spending more and more time and money following fashion trends What is your opinion Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, for example, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34857142857 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00136567555 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597142857143 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8338345505 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171670239833 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623634712708 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080970597132 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138543269049 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866331107141 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.