Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Every person has the right to education, without considering the sex of the person. The number of female and male students which universities accept annually is one of the challenges in recent years. In my opinion, it is unnecessary that in every subject the number of men and women is equal.
A good reason is that men are more effective than women and their efficiency is more significant. Many subjects in universities need physical activities such as rock mechanics laboratory, all sports fields, etc… and men do these easier than women. In addition, there are many different fields that although don’t have any physical activity, in the long term it makes to hurt the soul of women and change their behavior such as judgment. This job has a significant negative effect on the mood of women. Some jobs are specifically related to women such as the midwifery field. Hence, the practicality of jobs in society should be considered when universities accept students.
Another point is the responsibility that men have. The men have a very important response which is supporting their families’ especially financial support. The rate of employment in women is higher than in men because they can work for a lower salary and don’t have any expectations of their employees such as seniority and awards. This problem when solved universities notice it in accepting students. They should consider the status of the subject in society and then enroll students annually. Employment is a very important issue that should impact accepting university students.
In conclusion, it is very important that universities before accepting any student in a different subject notice the impact of them on society and the level of their essential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The first chart be ow shows energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 73
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...sier than women. In addition, there are many different fields that although don’t have any phy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1519434629 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88174622179 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515901060071 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.749204708 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222169285094 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792150386297 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084965135745 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159898509714 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907681361887 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.