Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? (08/2019)
Over the past few years, the wake of state-of-the-art technology has triggered far-reaching changed on people’s communication method. There are a plethora of measures in this trend have influenced our impersonal relationships, I concur with the idea that this influence could bring numerous positive outcomes.
It is undeniable to claim that the technology is likely to be subject in many aspects of our lives. The first effect is to allow the number of citizens having a desire to communicate with each other by clicking on a mouse or touching on a screen. Secondly, the goods consumptions are transformed by the development of technology throughout various ways. For instance, instead of hanging out to purchase essential things, online shopping is known for the alternative solution to possess a host of items, clothes and the like more efficient and faster or save their precious time which should apply for another aspect.
On the other hand, to facilitate human-living conditions, employing breakthrough devices could bring forward beneficial ramifications. First and foremost, job-holders or lucrative enterprises are unlikely to find their interactions onerous in terms of contracts, conferences, incomes, among others. In fact, they do not have the attempt to meet each other to discuss their works addressed via availing telephones, laptops to have face-to-face communication without encountering directly as the conventional method.
Secondly, in the aspect of education, there are a host of online services supporting teachers and students in conducting numerous E-learning courses. Taking the pandemic of Co-vid 19 as a shining example, online learning is considered as one of the optimal ways for learners to accumulate academic knowledges effectively. This not only makes a contribution to generating the safe the safest learning environment but also join hands with the authorities and governments to flatten the curb of death casualties based on implementing their solutions, particularly in minimizing the movement.
In conclusion, as cited above, the stride of technology undoubtedly creates a multitude of influences in respect of changing the resident’s communications, I comply that this development only offers our lives with all positive results.
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
- It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not all necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion with relevant examples 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 67
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime 78
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What causes and what are the problems 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 51, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...in the aspect of education, there are a host of online services supporting teachers ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69096209913 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30505790627 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626822157434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1809460028 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.153846154 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20141761959 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620286826142 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453668199036 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101707958436 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438488002061 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 51, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...in the aspect of education, there are a host of online services supporting teachers ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69096209913 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30505790627 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626822157434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1809460028 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.153846154 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20141761959 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620286826142 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453668199036 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101707958436 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438488002061 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.