Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has the technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, technology is becoming more popular than ever. It is everywhere on the planet and affects every single part of our lives. In the next few paragraphs we are going to discuss the impact of technology on our social lives and why I think that impact is both positive and negative.
First, technology has made our lives better in several ways. First of all, connecting with people has become like never before, for instance: you reach anyone, anywhere and anytime with just a click of a button. Secondly, you are able to meet with people living very far away from you online, for example: you can make a video call through your webcam and it would feel like you two are at the same place. Furthermore, it enabled us to learn more about any country in the world and thus we can keep up with our beloved one’s news.
On the other hand, technology may have dealt some negative effects on us in many aspects. Firstly, it has limited our face-to-face interactions with one another, e.g.: some people would rather send a message to their friends than meet up with them. Moreover, with the technological advancement, people seem to become more and more lonely than the earlier eras, for instance: they tend to stay on their phones or laptops all day every day, hence decreasing their interaction with humans. Lastly, we tend to spend several hours, more than recommended, on technological devices which leads to separation from the real world, such as: we deplete our time staying in the virtual world of social media or games.
All in all, the precedent was a discussion of the impacts technology has had on our lives and why I think that technology is a double-edged sword because despite having so much positive effects on our lives as it made life easier for us, it also has some negative ones as it limited our times with our beloved ones rendering our social life pale and dull.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | Mostafa Nabil | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Cambridge book 7 test 3 task 1 56
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'impacts'' or 'impact's'?
Suggestion: impacts'; impact's
..., the precedent was a discussion of the impacts technology has had on our lives and why...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71987951807 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48883958314 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9542628333 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3333333333 7.06120827912 217% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176310920264 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721561672196 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402832541294 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10721952181 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305702189462 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.