Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer.
What, in your opinion, should be the main function of a university?
Universities nowadays play a major role in societies as it provides them with the educated, knowledgeable manpower. In the next few paragraphs we are going to discuss the true function of any given university, the type of information they ought to provide for their students until graduation and why I think that the true function of universities should be a mixture of both preparation for work, and preparation for universities’ own benefit.
The first thing we are going to talk about is why some people think that universities must be the main provider of all the data and skills needed for work life. Firstly, for students, university is the main and most authentic source of information, for instance, a graduate is highly dependent on the data collected during his study period in university when he starts a new job. Secondly, for communities it would be optimum if all students graduate with the sufficient skills required for their jobs, e.g.: graduates will be productive in their jobs and thus help the nourishment of societies. Thirdly, for companies, this would save the lots of effort, such as: the time needed for training graduates and helping them adapt to the work environment will be much less than usual.
On the other hand, some argue that universities need to offer data only for its own good and that can be due to several reasons. Firstly, universities should only be concerned with their own staff and must allow data access to them, e.g.: they need to allow data for their researchers in order to help universities rank higher. Secondly, preparing undergraduates for work life is a very time-consuming process, for instance, it would need much more study hours. Thirdly, this process requires more manpower and effort which universities can’t handle because most of their personnel are concerned with their research and lectures. From my point of view, I think universities need to divide their effort and time between preparing undergraduates for work life and rising up with their staff’s level of knowledge, because this is the way for the greatest benefit for both a university and a society, e.g.: we would not only have qualified calibers for companies but also for universities.
All in all, the precedent has been a discussion of whether the true function of universities should be to provide skills for graduates to work with or to allow data only for its own benefit and why I think it should be a mixture of both of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | wardiati | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | morbymuku | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Pamela K | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Shahrear59 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of the fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd must allow data access to them, e.g.: they need to allow data for their resear...
^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erned with their research and lectures. From my point of view, I think universit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00481927711 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92131881921 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477108433735 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5648021671 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.083333333 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5833333333 20.7667163134 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410481365401 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178097465577 0.084324248473 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963324025773 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309696915986 0.151304729494 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662951565999 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.