The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the ages of people in both Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and show estimations for the year 2050.
Overall, in the year 2000 Yemeni people were younger than Italian. In addition, people of both countries will have become older by 2050.
In 2000, the number of children between 0-14 years old accounts for nearly half of the population in Yemen, whereas in Italy they constitute about 14.3% of the total population. People aging between 15-59 years were around 46.3% percent of Yemeni people, while being over half of the population of Italy (61.6%). Finally, the number of people exceeding 60 years of age represent the lowest fraction of the Yemeni population (3.6%). Meanwhile, in Italy they constitute nearly a quarter of the people (24.1%).
On the other hand, In Yemen, projections for 2050 expect that young children between 0-14 years will have decreased to 37%, while both people between 15-59 years and people above 60 years old will have risen to 57.3% and 5.7% respectively. While, in Italy the percentage of elderly people will have nearly doubled to become 42.3%, whereas the percentage of younger population (Those aging between 15-59 years old and children between 0-14 years of age) will have fallen to 46.2% and 11.5% respectively.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Cambridge book 7 test 3 task 1 56
- Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has the technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04225352113 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37289461281 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455399061033 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8560568 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140611390588 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791927648348 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532897778589 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116076687033 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062614745131 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.