Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake. Regadless of whether the course is useful to an employer.
What, in your opinion, should be the main function of a university ?
The concept of what kind of knowledge universities should provide the graduates has been under debate for a long time. In some people’s view the universities should pave the way for knowledge just for the sake of it. However, in my opinion, the most important function of a university should be to prepare the graduates with the knowledge that is going to be beneficial for their workplaces.
Knowledge is power, which is undeniable. But for knowledge to serve us it has to be relevant for our works. The primary purpose of a university is to prepare its graduates for their future lives. That is why it is important for them to acquire the knowledge which has the potential to coincide with their future work. Otherwise the education will be valueless. For instance, it is obsolete for a business major student to learn about art and art history if he/she is going to pursue a career in business. It will just be a waste of both time and money for the individual. This makes it important for the students to develop the skills and knowledge needed for their jobs.
Although according to some people it is important for the students to acquire knowledge for the sake of knowledge, it should be completely optional depending on individual preferences. If someone wants to learn about things that are not relevant for his/her potential work, he/she should be allowed to do that, the reason being is that it helps to develop someone as a sophisticated human being. Nevertheless, universities and students should always keep in mind the real purpose of higher education, which is to serve graduates in their career.
Overall, it should be clear from the above argument that university education should mainly focus on the workplace of the students that requires the need to design the curriculum accordingly. And acquiring knowledge for the sake of knowledge should come second.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-08 | wardiati | 61 | view |
2019-11-08 | morbymuku | 61 | view |
2019-11-08 | Pamela K | 56 | view |
2019-10-27 | Shahrear59 | 56 | view |
2019-10-17 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
- chinese urban expenditure 78
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources. 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today. 67
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 73
- art children 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to be beneficial for their workplaces. Knowledge is power, which is undeniable....
^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...ial to coincide with their future work. Otherwise the education will be valueless. For in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, as to, for instance, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95899053628 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81558774628 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463722397476 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4889497299 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406097076321 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160435493797 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919606240393 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299335993196 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923292344983 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.