In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport
Disucss both these views and give your own opinion.
As 21 century continues to unfold, some wealthy countries are becoming worried about climate changes and would argue that effective measures should be taken in order to survive our planet. So, one of these considerable changes is upgrading public transportation. Although people claim that construction of more efficient and faster railways are more likely to be beneficial, others opine that refreshing current public transportation should be any government a priority. In my view, public transports, which need to be referbished, help urban dwellers to meet their daily needs in the various aspects.
On the one hand, some authorities together with environmentalists believe that state-of-the-art railways have significant role to play ranging from enhancing individuals well being to decline the destructive factors, putting our environment on the verge of damage. Furthermore,since technological advances have arisen such as high-speed and environmentally friendly trains which are able to transfer great deal of travellers and goods not only domestically but also inter continental faster than ever before. However, these new high tech procedures pose financial burden on governments but it is worth it in the long run.
On the other side of spectrum, opponents would argue that public transportations even in high developed countries are not as sufficient as they ought to be. Therefore, government funding should be diverted into public transports, especially in mega cities with ever increasing population. Moreover, they need constant protection and reviving, otherwise poeple will lose their enthusiasms in order to use them regularly.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments,it is hard to ignore the role of quality railways but it does not seem sensible, spending billion dollars on railways, while cities transportation suffers from enormous difficulties which keeps citizens away from using them and consequently, lead to wide array of ecological and traffic issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-07 | chargedbyfaith | 67 | view |
- The table below Shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one University
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- the table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university 75
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called islip as it is now ans plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , since
...ment on the verge of damage. Furthermore,since technological advances have arisen such...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...t, based on the aforementioned arguments,it is hard to ignore the role of quality r...
^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...but it does not seem sensible, spending billion dollars on railways, while cities trans...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70764119601 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27754629068 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661129568106 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7690420373 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.181818182 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187026256701 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639639467531 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490393260106 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100565822345 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447343930118 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.