In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the

Some people argue that policy makers should construct more railway tracks for the modern fast running trains, while there are some opponents who believe that government should improve the current public transport. In my opinion, spending on new railway tracks is a wise idea.

Presently, rails are the fastest mode of transportation, as commuters can travel from one city to another in half the time, when compared to bus or taxi. Admittedly, because of the increased number of private vehicles, traffic jams have been rising on the roads of cities, in this way, people travelling in trains have advantage over those commuting by other locomotives, since there are no such difficulties on the rail lines. Moreover, the trains are cheaper mode of transportation when travelling to long distances and therefore they are more pocket friendly. The fare of other transports are almost triple than rails. With the rising inflation, middle-class denizens can not afford costly ways of commuting.

Paradoxically, the proponents think that rails are not a prefferable mode of travelling among the countryside areas because people living in villages mostly use bus or taxi to commute, therefore if government would spend money on new railway lines then it might not benefit all the country. Furthermore, in a developing nation, if policy makers would invest on railway lines then country might face some financial crisis, hence spending money on existing transportation for the improvement is a better idea than construction of new railway tracks.

To conclude, although there are some demerits of building tracks for rails. Nevertheless, the disadvantages can be overlooked, as the speedy locomotives are prominent in the fast pace of life.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om one city to another in half the time, when compared to bus or taxi. Admittedly...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35401459854 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92399548342 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4811801427 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293959457759 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901786051041 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081163719973 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164147334441 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089154286714 0.056905535591 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.