Online education is becoming more and more popular. Some people claim that e-learning has so many benefits that it will replace face-to-face education soon. Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Indeed, technology has been improved as compared to past era by which it also impacts on the way of learning, where a group of people think that e-learning will replace other ways of learning while remain individuals claim that traditional way of education is more beneficial over any other way of learning and it is irreplaceable.
To commence with, there are many reasons why people think that e-learning has more advantageous. Firstly, it is the quick source of information in which pupils can easily find the solutions of their doubtswith the help of e-education due to this they gain up-to-date knowledge which helps them to compete in the competitive era. Secondly, it is time saver, learners can get knowledgewithin no time and utilize their extra time to enjoy themselves from their busy schedule.
On the other hand, traditional way of learning has their own merits. It gives rise to many qualities in the individuals because when they work in a group they face different things and it leads to their experience and they learn cooperation, discipline, honesty and puntuality which nurture their personality. Additionally, some occupations require practical knowledge such as medical field and teaching so theoretical knowledge is not applicable for these. Along with it, classrooms has comfortable environment for learning pupils easily concentrate on their tasks.
In my opinion, traditional education has more advantages than e-learnng, individuals learn other qualities and moral values along with education which helps them to become a good personality in the public.
In conclusion, it can be asserted that both ways of learning has their own importance but traditional way of education never be replaced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | dindin_8 | 58 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | huynhthithuyduong | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | amnuverma | 81 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | amnuverma | 73 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- Some people think that politicians have the greatest influence on the world while others believe that scientists are more influential Discuss both sides of view and give your opinion 73
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefits that it will replace face to face education soon Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefits that it will replace face to face education soon Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Nowadays online shopping is extremely popular Discuss the impact of it on environment and on people who lost their job because of it 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...ing will replace other ways of learning while remain individuals claim that tradition...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36764705882 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04262538019 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569852941176 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.0489316164 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260523541498 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100589642538 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781563031179 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153797765382 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652315412415 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...ing will replace other ways of learning while remain individuals claim that tradition...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36764705882 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04262538019 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569852941176 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.0489316164 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260523541498 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100589642538 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781563031179 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153797765382 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652315412415 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.