Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Is it a positive or negative development

Traditional methods of shopping have been replaced with online shopping in many parts of world. This trend has its own pros and cons. However, in my conviction its positive sides outweigh negative ones.

I think the most noticeable advantage of online shopping is more variety of goods. It provides access to a wider range of products and the possibility to compare them thoroughly, So that the process of choosing will be facilitated. For example, in case of buying electronic devices or appliances such as mobile or cameras, online shop sites usually have sections for comparing the main features of your selective devices in a table. That gives you a comprehensive view about them and helps you to choose the best product which meets your demand and your budget. As opposed to online shopping, there are limited products in one store and perhaps you need to go to several stores to find your intended stuff which could be a waste of time. Also it would be hard to see and compare side by side the products from different stores.

When it comes to online shopping drawbacks, the most important thing that comes to my mind is discrepancies between the products' images on the internet and the real ones. This might be because of either deliberate deceptive edits on products' images by sellers or difficulties in recognizing real features remotely. For instance, when you want to buy cloths, you need to wear them for choosing the right size and touch them to realize the fabric material. Also, it happens for finding the right shade of cosmetics or choosing perfumes which is impossible to realize their scent without smelling. Therefore, it is probable to buy things that you have unreal and delusive imagination about them through their pictures on the online shop sites which would make you desperate after receiving.

In conclusion, I agree that online shopping is becoming more common day to day and I think despite having some downsides, it could be beneficial in numerous ways.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d stuff which could be a waste of time. Also it would be hard to see and compare sid...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95820895522 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61206140444 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561194029851 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9969081086 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24460240998 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824056013112 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952954837017 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167821813482 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874309062795 0.056905535591 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.