The only way to improve the safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree with this idea?
Misfortunes that happen on the roads have been of major concern to all in society. Many have put forward the idea of cracking down on road misdemeanors by means of heavier penalties. Notwithstanding its merits, there are other alternatives that have proved to be as effective.
On the one hand, prohibitive fines would serve as deterrents for future offenders. For example, in Vietnam, there are traffic regulations aimed to prevent reckless driving; however, those are not strong enough to stop drivers from taking risks. Besides, many traffic wardens in this country are too lenient and just let the law-breakers off with a warning or at most a small fine. If this were to be implemented soon, cases of road accidents can be considerably reduced. In addition to this, for more serious offenses such as driving under the influence of substances, besides a tidy sum of money as a fine, tougher measure such as the confiscation of their driving licenses or a stilt of community service should be adopted as those people are highly dangerous to others when they are behind the wheel.
On the other hand, other steps are also of great use when it comes to curbing traffic problems. The first option is for authorities to install more CCTVs on the street. This action would do wonders to stop any drives who have the intention of braking the speed limits or jumping the red lights. Without such misconducts, the chances of accidents are much slimmer. However, some may argue that this may cost a huge amount of tax-payers’ money which can be used otherwise. This of course holds some truth, but this step can benefit each individual and the society as a whole. Another answer to this problem is to increase the number and frequency of traffic wardens on the street. Psychologically speaking, the mere presence of the police or people of authority can exert a significant influence on people’s behavior. In fact, if someone is thinking of breaking the law and they catch sight of a cop, they may drop their intended act for that moment.
To conclude, stricter measures to deal with the problem do have its merits. There are, nonetheless, other solutions which should be adopted along with only punishing people for their wrong, possibly unintentional, doings.
- Teleworking has been on the increase in recent years Do youy think this is positive and negative development 56
- Teleworking has been on the increase in recent years Do you think this is a negative or postive development 11
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 89
- Nowadays most people try to balance work and other aspects of their life Unfortunately not many people achieve this balance What problem does this cause Can you suggest some solutions to this issue 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, for example, in addition, in fact, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95275590551 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73196198007 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58530183727 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7875469162 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3157894737 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138268677402 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395187991863 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361841136191 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877348382088 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307804834794 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.