Nowadays, most people try to balance work and other aspects of their life. Unfortunately, not many people achieve this balance.
What problem does this cause?
Can you suggest some solutions to this issue?
It is obvious that work is the most crucial part of a person’s life as most of a person’s time is spent on this aspect. However, other commitments also contribute to their overall well-being. Therefore, there is a dire need to strike the balance between work and these parts, which is hardly attained by the majority of people. A number of issues come as the results, and solutions to them will be put forwards in this essay.
With regard to the repercussions of this trend, employees’ family and overall well-being are most adversely affected. Firstly, as more time is spent at work, the time that one spends at home with their loved ones will diminish accordingly. For example, they may not have time to talk to their children about what happened to them during their school day or not have time to take them to fun fairs or theme parks to have fun. These activities in fact can help tighten family’s bonds; without them, the family relationship will suffer. In addition, allocating much of a person’s day in the workplace means that they do not spare enough time for relaxation and revitalization. This in the long term can have prejudicial ramifications on the worker’s health. Combined with loosened family ties, they are likely to suffer from poor health conditions.
It is, therefore, imperative for measures to combat this matter to be taken. One viable solution is for employees to prioritize the commitments in their life. What this means is if they value family more, they must choose the kind of job that they can do well with the least time possible. This usually equates to doing a job that may not be their best choice. As for the second concern, should new workers in an organization do part-time jobs, go on work experience placements during their time at university, they will be able to adapt to new working environments with no problems. Besides, there should be support available to them when they are stuck. If these initiatives were taken by employers and senior colleagues alike, this situation could be reversed and people can reduce the time they spend on work and as a result, work-life balance can be ameliorated.
In summary, there is a myriad of reasons for this thorny issue but chief among those are intimidating amounts of work and ill management skill. However, with support and good preparation on the part of the employees, this problem can be lessened.
- Teleworking has been on the increase in recent years Do you think this is a negative or postive development 11
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most society How does this quality affect each individual and is it a positive or negative trend 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays most people try to balance work and other aspects of their life Unfortunately not many people achieve this balance What problem does this cause Can you suggest some solutions to this issue 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supported'?
Suggestion: supported
...h no problems. Besides, there should be support available to them when they are stuck. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in addition, in fact, in summary, kind of, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85644768856 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71612193972 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6583039066 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.55 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254980665662 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843178186099 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607072654293 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180443226292 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577540518284 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.